Tue May 27 2008 19:52:06 By: rapsux ( 495)
well, scott is X@@##! up and a freak of nature, and wasnt commited. axl at least was commited. he tried to take too much control and was an X@@##!. 4 example, wen gnr covered the rolling stones sympathy 4 the devil, slash wanted the guitar licks to be hard rock, axl wanted them to sound like the stones' version. so axl had a friend that the rest of the band didnt like and overdubb slash's guitar parts with his. scott was good, but axing him was 4 the better. i wudnt want 2 be around him either.