Sun Oct 25 2009 14:06:17 By: Anonymous User
Sorry for John. Remember this though- in the late 1970s the government forced the military to take a vaccination, claiming an epidemic was on the way and we found out later it was a lie the government used in order to use up its aging swine flu vaccine. The vaccine proved toxic to some people and killed others, particularly the elderly and the vaccine was also responsible for causing a permanent spinal disorder as well.
How is the new vaccine safer than the old one? Why is the government not forth coming about the risks of the swine flu vaccine?
Also, the focus should be elsewhere, as in natural VS chemicals. Even in the worst plagues that ever reached civilization, such as the bubolic in Europe in 1350 that killed off a third of the population, (nothing like this situation), but worth noting is that there were always a large number of people that were untouched. Not much focus is put on that. Not much money in it is one suspected reason, but it's too bad most people don't learn the natural mechanisms that discourage illness and bring about better health.
http://waterremedy.net