Fri Jul 3 2009 16:02:09 By: shirljan ( 379)
It concerns me that a mother who truly loves her children would be "undecided".
She gave them up once.....now there's love for ya ! She's quite the mommy.

Fri Jul 3 2009 18:20:38 By: nicerack ( 9084)
Leave the kids alone! I hope she doesn't decide to pursue the matter.

Sat Jul 4 2009 11:12:15 By: Blues_Lover ( 2088)
I know what you mean shirljan and how it may appear, that Ms. Rowe walked away after receiving money. But I caution you to sit through some Court Proceedings involving Custody and Visitation in America, before you hastily assume all parents who are not wealthy -and some folks who even pay Court Ordered Support religiously-, willingly wanted to give up parenting and/or visitation rights. Were not money, power, and/or lies by parties duly influencing, to gain custody while one gives up ALL THEIR RIGHTS? I realize in this case, Ms. Rowe had no elder children but when a parent has given up ALL their RIGHTS, after their successful parenting has been proven with older children in the past, I bid you, LOOK FURTHER.

Sat Jul 4 2009 11:21:01 By: cat27 ( 1967)
I HAVE sat through custody proceeding in California....Ms. Rowe didn't. Her descision was done because the kids were "a gift" to Michael (her words) for which she was generously compensated. She WAS and IS nothing more than a surrogate.
Of course she is now "undecided"! She would have way too many hard questions to answer that would not leave her looking like a devoted mom who was robbed of her rights, but more like a mercenary trolling or further cash payouts based on her "gifts" to Michael.