Comments on OK! Magazine Michael Jackson Cover Picture Features MJ Dead On Stretcher

Thu Jul 2 2009 12:25:08 By: Tom Sizemore (

18677)
It's NOT cool to put a photo of a great man's corpse on the cover of a magazine.

However, it IS *awesome* to put a photo of an evil, child-molesting freak on the cover.

Way to go OK! Change your name to SUPER!

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 12:32:46 By: TheJoker (

318)
I heard about this yesterday and how surprising that the sleaziest celebrity magazine out there bought this picture, its disgraceful, what a way to tarnish fans' memory, i hope people boycott this magazine. R.I.P Michael Jackson.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 12:36:06 By: cat27 (

1967)
His family, his friends even his kids for God's sake....can see this! It is NOT ok, not appropriate, not neccesary and NOT anyone's business.
Let the man be!

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 12:38:30 By: Tom Sizemore (

18677)
cat27...a "man" doesn't rape boys.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 12:42:31 By: cat27 (

1967)
A very sick man does Tom, and as I recall, MJ was acquitted of that crime.
We are all human and thus all flawed and fallible. MJ was no different. He was HUMAN and a very conflicted, troubled human at that. He deserves, at least in death, the tiny respect to NOT have photos of his corpse plastered all over magazine covers.MHO.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 12:45:13 By: Tom Sizemore (

18677)
I don't include pedophiles under the definition of "human" cat27.
Learn the history of this evil piece of plastic called "Michael Jackson"
http://tinyurl.com/m6t9ln

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 12:52:25 By: The H8R (

706)
Is that a pic of his corpse or a photo from the 'Dangerous' tour? I can't tell the difference

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:00:31 By: chunky lover 53 (

14530)
The only reason MJ was acquitted is that he spent his entire fortune to keep his perverted and boney a$$ out of jail.
However, he did write "Thriller" so I guess its "O.K." for him to rape any little boy he wants.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:02:28 By: chunky lover 53 (

14530)
Q: How can you tell if Michael Jackson has a hot date?
A: There's a big wheel parked outside his house.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:05:06 By: chunky lover 53 (

14530)
Q: What's the difference between Michael Jackson and a grocery bag?
A: One is white, made out of plastic, and dangerous for kids to play with and the other you carry your groceries in.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:14:46 By: Scorpio54 (

2)
Show some respect!

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:15:46 By: chunky lover 53 (

14530)
"Show some respect!"
How about, NO!

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:19:52 By: TheJoker (

318)
I honestly hate the human race, all of you disrespectful, inhumane arseholes should burn, i wish i could do it personally. Obviously you didnt look at the facts of Michael Jackson's court case, Gavin Arvizo changed his story numerous times, he told a teacher he wasnt molested, so how the hell would you know what MJ did? Some people have no brain cells whatsoever.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:20:42 By: lfp626 (

7)
...the comments from people regarding someone they only heard/read things about are off the wall.I think that we are to love all people and hate whatever sin they do/did.I cannot say what Michael Jackson is/was guilty of because I just don't know...what I do know is that he was a fantastic performer who has died what seems to be an awful death. I am sad for his family,and pray that his soul is resting now.I think the choice to place his dead body on the cover of a magagine(I'm not familiar with) is a ploy to make money...it just lets us know that you are "worldly" in your ways.
Thanx

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:22:37 By: The H8R (

706)
"his soul is resting now"
(READ: He's getting sodomized by Lucifer as we speak)

LOL @ TheJoker...what about the hundreds of other kids he raped and whose lives he ruined? I agree with you, "disrespectful, inhumane arseholes" like Michael Jackson "should burn"

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:25:06 By: Tom Sizemore (

18677)
If Hitler made Thriller would he be in the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame today?

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:25:10 By: franceta (

10)
Some seemed to forget Michael was found not guilty of that crime but some people get pleasure from others misery,also things are coming out now on the internet but i guess that is of no interest to any one because all you are after is a story even if it untrue.One thing for sure i will not be buying OK Magazine anymore,not after that photo of Michael. The fact of the matter, you people have no class!.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:26:11 By: chunky lover 53 (

14530)
Honestly, I think all you MJ fans have been drinking a little too much "Jesus Juice" you know, the alcohol Michael used on his victims.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:27:55 By: TheJoker (

318)
No its people like you H8R who consume everything the media have to say, your so naive, you dont know anything, do you have proof MJ did any of those things? Didnt think so.
I honestly wish every single human being on earth was dead, it might make the world a better place because no one these days would know what respect was even if it hit them in the face.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:30:28 By: Tom Sizemore (

18677)
Hey Joker, 16 years worth of extremely well researched FACTS, all backed up. The Jackson family has NEVER disputed any of the FACTS in these article because all the FACTS about MJ's child molestation and drug abuse are bullet proof.
http://tinyurl.com/m6t9ln

Would you be backing up Charles Manson if he died today?

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:30:40 By: chunky lover 53 (

14530)
Q: Who does Michael Jackson consider a Perfect "10"?
A: Two 5 year olds.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:32:28 By: TheJoker (

318)
Bullet proof? really? so how come he was acquitted in a court of law? yeah thats totally bullet proof, did you even listen to the ''evidence'' of those supposed children that were molested? Honestly people are so naive to believe the media speculation.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:32:34 By: lfp626 (

7)
To the Joker...we are already "dead" if we are not a believer of God...we are spiritually dead...which is why people are so drawn to these worldly issues so often.I read some of these comments and couldn't pass by without saying something.To H8R,have a heart.HAHAHAHA

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:33:30 By: Tom Sizemore (

18677)
Read the articles and FACTS for your answers joker. The one paid-off acquittal you speak of does not negate HUNDREDS of sexually abused boys and decades or drug abuse. You are so naive.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:33:55 By: TheJoker (

318)
Yes i am dead lfp626, inside, i just wish the rest of the human race was dead on the outside too, maybe it would give the world a chance to not end early.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:35:49 By: TheJoker (

318)
Hmm really so show me some hard evidence of these supposed boys being abused and paid off? Erm i think youll find it was taken all the way, yes the one in the 90s was paid off but not the 2005 one, MJ was found to be innocent. And if there are supposedly hundreds, why have only 2 spoken out? Your argument is a joke.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:37:42 By: lfp626 (

7)
Tom,why are these issues so important to you?

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:37:54 By: Tom Sizemore (

18677)
TheJoker, stop making yourself look like such a moron and READ THE FACTS. There's like 50 pages worth of stuff, so take an hour or two and come back with your tail between your legs. We'll be waiting.

"Tom,why are these issues so important to you?"
Because I am a caring human being that believes child molesters are some of the sickest, most evil "people" on the planet. If you are OK with adults sexually abusing children I suggest you reexamine your morals.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:39:30 By: chunky lover 53 (

14530)
McDonald's is bringing out a new burger ..."Michael Jackson Burger"...
It has 50 yr old meat inside 5 yr old buns.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:41:01 By: lfp626 (

7)
Joker,I agree with you on that point.Michael was never convicted of these accusations. You know these parents should be the ones put in jail...they were after some money at the expense of their children..

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:47:22 By: lfp626 (

7)
Tom,I care about people as well but I don't condemn a man when I don't know the facts.My morals are not in question here...

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:52:26 By: lfp626 (

7)
Pussykat,it just shows you that the accusers were really after some money...a payoff to keep quiet...I think Michael Jackson was a very naive person wanting badly to live the childhood he never had.He accepted people as they were never questioning their motives...these children were allowed by their parents to spend time alone w/Michael (I don't know what took place),but these parents should have done a better and more responsible job in monitoring their children. If Michael was such a bad person why did they continue to put their children off on him?

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 13:52:56 By: bigurl1 (

10)
Vile, Disgusting, Sick, Immoral bastards, when you think it's not possible they sunk to a new low in order to peddle their putrid trash! He can't even die in peace! Shame on them.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 14:25:38 By: stephanie3000 (

10)
Tom michael was not a pedophile,now if u want to blame some one blame those dumbass parents who would allow there kids too spend time with a grown as man.I also blame his family for watching him go down the way he did,michael was sick in more ways than one.I grew up on michael and i love michael now and forever just for the way that he is.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 14:27:32 By: chunky lover 53 (

14530)
The Pope has issued a proclamation on Michael Jackson. If he hears any more
allegations about little boys, the Pope says he'll have no choice but to make
him a priest.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 14:42:17 By: stephanie3000 (

10)
look stop with the michael bashing ok let him rest please.But if u want to talk about molesting lets talk about some priests that are right now molesting little boys and little girls.The last case the mother was on welfare and she also tried to get money from Jay Leno,also Chris Tucker.Let him rest ya'll judging him for no reason just be mindful that God is judging all of us.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 14:48:03 By: chunky lover 53 (

14530)
Q. What's the worst stain to try and remove from a little boy's underpants?
A. Michael Jackson's makeup.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 15:36:13 By: vikingsfan09 (

1)
All I have to say to this tom and cat Michael Jackson was a CHILD I think a 7 year old boy and NEVER had a CHILDHOOD what wrong with you why would their only 2 kids saying this and where were the other guys that hurt kids in that way their is always always more then one kid that's all I have to say and I will NEVER buy ok again

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 15:42:03 By: cat27 (

1967)
@Tom Sizemore....are you seriously going to compare MJ, an accused and acquiied child molester with Adolph Hitler...who let a nation to the torture and murder of MILLIONS?
Wit Charles Manson who planned and orchestrated the brutal murders of several people including a pregnant woman?
You need a little perspective there bud, but thankfully there is one much wiser than all of us to whom we all answer and he isn't on Starpulse....MJ will answer to him as will you and I.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 15:43:54 By: Tom Sizemore (

18677)
@cat27...No, I'm not necessarily....just creating talking points....
i.e. How EVIL does a person have to be where it can no longer be ignored? Apparently many people find child molestation an excusable and acceptable practice IF the molester made Thriller. I was wondering what other deplorable people would be praised had THEY been the ones to create Thriller.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 15:52:18 By: cat27 (

1967)
MJ did a great deal more than one song/video. Since you are keen on javing people research his alleged transgression perhaps YOU could research the vast number of charities to which he contributed.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 15:55:06 By: Tom Sizemore (

18677)
@cat27...gladly...
"In the 2000 Guinness Book of Records, Michael Jackson is cited for the most charities supported by a pop star and he constantly flies around the world picking up lifetime-achievement and humanitarian awards. In fact, that was why he was in Germany when he dangled the baby. However, as Roger Friedman reported in his Fox 411 on-line column in February 2002, "the last tax filing available "for 1999" shows Jackson giving no money to other charities at all and receiving no donations from others." The Heal the World Foundation's Web site appears not to have been updated since 1996, and the charity Earth Care, which his brother Jermaine announced on Larry King Live this past January, has not materialized. In 1998, Britain's Charity Commission shut down Heal the World, which had not made a donation in three years. According to London's Daily Mail, the commission concluded, "The name had been so disfigured by the actions of Michael Jackson that it was not worth continuing to run the organisation in any form." Inside Edition recently reported that the only donation Heal the World made in 2000 was a transfer of $100,000 to the Heal the Kids Initiative, which Jackson began with gadfly Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, author of Kosher Sex. That $100,000 is so far unaccounted for, and the New York State attorney general's office has served Heal the Kids with a notice of failure to comply with filing requirements.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 15:56:54 By: Tom Sizemore (

18677)
@cat27....can I add "Donates money to charity (sometimes)" to my list of reasons people will overlook a molester's child raping and instead praise him as an icon?

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 16:03:17 By: Marcus Garvey (

4203)
ive refrained from commenting to this point, but i totally agree with tom. everyone who is praising him as a saint is a X@@##! hypocrite. revisionist history at its best. the only thing that comes close is republicans claiming reagan as one of the best presidents ever at the time of his death. he made great music, but he was a perverted freak. one does not cancel out the other

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 16:34:50 By: trek (

192)
This cover is not ok. No matter what MJ did or didn't do his children should never have to see this picture.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 16:47:48 By: stephanie3000 (

10)
tom so x##$@@!what,damn the damn crocodile hunter put his baby boy a damn crocodile at the sme time michael did what he did but nobody made a big deal about that did they no,just make sure when its your time to go make you repent.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 16:55:05 By: Tom Sizemore (

18677)
@stephanie3000...you're stupidity is shocking.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 16:58:46 By: Dr_Acula (

21)
Whatever your opinion is on Michael Jackson, this picture is so disrespectful. Buying a picture of any dead person and selling it as a cover is completely disgusting and disrespectful and should be punished.
R.I.P Michael Jackson

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 17:02:43 By: stephanie3000 (

10)
i don't worry about what you think of me like i said who X@@##! cares the man is dead,dead let him rest its over your mean words don't mean X@@##! those who love him

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 17:03:21 By: nicerack (

9049)
I think that was wrong and inconsiderate to Michael's family members and beloved fans.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 17:05:21 By: stephanie3000 (

10)
Dr Acula thank you

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 17:15:52 By: nicerack (

9049)
Judge not! leave that for the almighty God!

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 18:08:23 By: Tangie Girl (

351)
Yuck! I don't want to see ANY dead bodies on the cover of a magazine no matter who they are! I can barely stand open casket funerals but at least I'm warned! Don't want to be minding my business at the grocery store waiting to get to the register then see a magazine cover with a dead person on it! Yuck!

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 18:18:22 By: teecee1945 (

1)
If you all think it is vile and disgusting to put this picture on the cover of a magazine, what are you doing on this website looking it!???? LOL

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 18:42:28 By: Tangie Girl (

351)
^ Exactly. This is a blog. Can hardly get around the pic to post a comment.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 19:04:55 By: callstarz (

1)
Michael was such a wonderful man and he wanted people to see whatever he did or however he looked so he would be fine with it-especially since we don't get to see him ever again.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 19:56:51 By: cat27 (

1967)
Marcus....who here has called him a "saint". I call him a human being.....a frail, fallible human being just like you and I.

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 20:12:04 By: jacko02 (

8)
My God how wrong to put this on the front of a tabloid , who stopped to think of his mother kid,s and family having to deal with this , hang your heads in shame and all for a quick buck and this is from Ireland so I,m sure the rest of the world is watching as well and is less than impressed

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 20:17:01 By: vader78 (

2)
so I guess it was OK to put Princess Diana's "last photo" on a cover and the people not be mad but not for him?

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 20:18:53 By: vader78 (

2)
tabloids are sick anyway but people still buy them, and how many of you that posted that this is wrong have bought tabloids? 80%!

[Report]

Thu Jul 2 2009 21:56:17 By: mydestiny (

2)
i really think this picture of the greatest man that once lived is disrespectful. how dare this filthy magazine post such picture of MJ on their cover just to sell a few dollars. This world is truly f....d up.this man gave everything to make a better change for this human race. he loved everyone.he entertained us all. he will live forever in our hearts. we love him. he did not molest anyone, those children were lying . their sorry X@@##! parents put them up to those sick and twisted lies. i know they cant sleep in peace now. RIP MJ...let him rip, to all u filthy haters out there, keep ur negative and rude comments to ur self. let us show some respect.

[Report]

Fri Jul 3 2009 00:00:07 By: jlowe308 (

319)
I think they already have and it is repulsing we dont need to see all that.Yes he is a celeb but thats very private and may hurt his family so I think people need to get over it.Respect the family sont destroy them while their dealing with their loss.Idiot tabloids.

[Report]

Fri Jul 3 2009 05:15:28 By: hatsoff2us (

1997)
Keep hanging in there, Cat27, I agree with you totally.

[Report]

Fri Jul 3 2009 09:29:53 By: Peacelily (

1)
This is a sad time in our lives. Michael Jackson was a good man. He loved children and was accused of things he never did just because of his love for children and because he had money. I think Michael was a very sad man inside and yes he was different. I believe he made himself look different just because he was never really happy with himself and yet gave his heart to the world and really did make a difference in the world for the good. Much of his music was about the uncaring and injustice in the world. He was loved by so many and he and his music will never be forgotten. My heart goes out to his children and family and my prayers are with them all. He is now with God his maker and all his pain is gone and he has found complete love, peace and acceptance from his Heavenly Father who has always loved him....but something I believe Michael was looking for his whole life. He gave so much love to children and everyone else. He wanted to make everyone else happy expecially children. Michael was a Super Star and yet he was never satisfied with himself because he never realized in his heart that God made him and loved him just the way he was. Thank you Michael for giving everything you had and touching our hearts with your love and your music. You did touch the world with your love and you will never be forgotten. We love you.

[Report]

Fri Jul 3 2009 10:56:54 By: 4gdssk (

1)
It's crazy that there are so many people saying the pic is not ok to be on the cover. It is a sensationalist magazine, of course they are going to do things like that. What bothers me is that he is not dead, you are not looking at a corpse. He died almost 4 hours after being found by his doctor, if you look at the news he was taken to the hospital about an hour after his doctor found him. Is it sad and disrespectful to the family, yes. But they are used to living in the public eye and that is what happens. Plus do you think they even READ Ok! Magazine? And during this time of grief? Probably not. On all the other things here everyone has already agreed, he was a very talented musician and he was a freak. What ever he did or didn't do we will never know for sure, but he certainly didn't keep everyone from the weirdness going on in his life and I would've much rather not seen all that. Weird and freaky was his life, whether all his fault or his parent's fault for taking his childhood away. The weirdest thing is that everyone matures at some point and goes on with their lives, which is why his life is such an oddity.

[Report]

Fri Jul 3 2009 14:13:38 By: Micheal JACKSON WIFEY (

11)
I think they went too far micheal was a very private person, why the press had to take he's dead picture and sell it, i hope he HAUNTS them all, they made he's life misrable, but now that he's gone i hope he could rest in peace, but then that wouldn't be possiable because they still talking X@@##! about him, what about the good things he did??? and everybody else that talks smack about him i hope i seriously hope he haunts each and one of ya'll, who u be to judge him, did u knew the reall micheal jackson i don't think so, ya'll just heard stupid rumors and believe it, he was the sweetest guy most senditive most caring,

I LOVE YOU BABY
R.I.P MJ

[Report]

Fri Jul 3 2009 14:38:05 By: Mel79 (

2)
For god stakes people let the poor man rest in peace! we miss u MJ! But we will keep ur music ALIVE! And putting that pic on front of OK they did it for the fans.. the fans that want to b apart of MJ's death... I c where they r coming from.. but NOW. Let him rest in PEACE!

[Report]

Fri Jul 3 2009 14:42:28 By: Mel79 (

2)
one more of many things I want to say to MJ.. Thank you for showing the world what life should really be all about... U left a mark on this earth.. YOu'r fans are in deep mourn still on this day... YOu passed away and millions of hearts were broken and their child hood was taken away..

[Report]

Fri Jul 3 2009 17:19:37 By: myvictori (

1)
I never bought the magazine before, now I never will. I say boycott. It was tasteless. Whatever you think of MJ he was still a human being. The magazine was being too GREEDY--point blank!

[Report]

Fri Jul 3 2009 19:03:22 By: HagenK (

1)
This is disgusting. My husand died in 1994 and had I seen somthing like this on the cover of a magazine it would have upset me beyond belief. I pray Michael's
children do not have to see this

[Report]

Fri Jul 3 2009 20:07:11 By: skiddles13 (

41)
ok its uncool to put a dead man on the cover of a magazine even if he raped a 12 year old and dagled a baby over a balcony!how about we put u dead on the cover of a magazine where ur family can see u dead!
ur jerks!U MAKE ME MAD!

[Report]

Sat Jul 4 2009 18:35:33 By: katyb (

1)
Disgusting! I would hope true Michael Jackson fans would boycott this raggey magazine. I hope their sales hit rock bottom!

[Report]

Sat Jul 4 2009 18:47:27 By: vannytnt (

64)
tom sizemore's reaction is that of someone who was molested him/herself....there is no way that photo on the cover can be viewed as constructive, acceptable...it is truely obscene and disrespectful to his family and fans

[Report]

Sat Jul 4 2009 18:49:59 By: vannytnt (

64)
tom sizemore....besides being aquitted of the alleged crime twice....the child admitted to being coached to lie by his parents in order to make money...guess you can accept this bit of trivia on the matter because of your own unresloved issues.

[Report]

Sat Jul 4 2009 18:59:11 By: vannytnt (

64)
chunky l is sure about MJ molesting little boys because.......??? he/she is reading the same tabloids, news papers that we are which all have the same information...how is chunky L so sure??????? there is only one way......i will eat my words or of course he/she was a victim him/herself thats the only way to be sure of something like that is to be there your self in person ....

[Report]

Sat Jul 4 2009 19:23:44 By: Rs oiza (

4)
Tom don,t tell me u are still jealous of michael even in death.vulture,have some respect for the dead.

[Report]

Sun Jul 5 2009 05:50:10 By: sarahw (

1)
Disgraceful!
Ive been a fan of michael jackson for 20 yrs since i was 8,
With great talent comes fame + fortune,
with that comes all the greedy money grabbing ar**holes, talentless people who hate, disrespect + are jelous of people who have made something of their lives + lots of money therefore would do anything to steal some of that fortune that they do not deserve
The fact that MJ had no childhood, was so naive + childlike in adulthood made him the perfect target,
Thats why he had all the things that he never had the chance to have + see as a child
what is so wrong with that, we as humans take for granted little things like going to the zoo, the cinema even the playground as a child
some kids dont get that chance.
I have always said that what kind of mother would happily demand + accept a payout over their childs jutice if the claims were true?
As a mum of 3 i would do anything in my power to seek jutice if that were me,
the father of jordy chandler claimed he saw MJ touching his son in his bed + walked off to calm down! what kind of father would let a grown man stay in his sons room + walk away if they wewre to witness this, if anything anger would make you more determined to drag the person out of the bed + kill them!
if i can see the lies at 13 why cant grown adults?
people should be allowed to live their life how they choose + not be slammed for it!
I wish his family well in this difficult time especially his children
R.I.P michael you were the best and always will be

[Report]

Sun Jul 5 2009 11:20:18 By: grinningizmo (

1)
oh for christs sake the mans dead who cares anymore?i was never a fan of michael jackson howvwer the guy was found not guilty so let it be. he was someone who was forever trying to create the childhood he never had. yes he was messed up.. yes he had children stay over but lets face it the parents of these children are as much to blame! He was found not guilty, yet small minded people still feel the need to follow the crowd and call him a peadophile. its boring now.
i wonder though, how would you react if for the rest of your life u were branded a peadophile,when actually u are innocent??

[Report]

Sun Jul 5 2009 18:15:27 By: Maikeo (

2672)
I would say it wasn't cool but on the other hand OK knew that it would make money. His fans will purchase it for all type of reasons.

[Report]

Sun Jul 5 2009 19:15:56 By: InLoveWithMJ (

3)
LEAVE HIM ALONE BULLIES ! MY god, you people are so cruel and evil... You will be judged ! Are you that pathetic and bored that you must pick on a deceased person who cannot defend himself ?
Rest in peace sweet MichaelI will forever love you~Angela

[Report]

Tue Jul 7 2009 22:16:27 By: vannytnt (

64)
the most worrying thing is the fact that people choose what to believe and based on our own experiences we superimpose our feelings of self loathing and low self esteem on someone who cannot defend themselves - the 'dead' - MJs detractors sure feel good when they bash him like cowards via this medium, in truth they are pathetic victims of their own circumstance and in my professional view were likely to have been abused themselves

[Report]

Tue Jul 7 2009 22:31:55 By: stephanie3000 (

10)
i wish u people leave him alone if u don't quit looking at him i mean for real michael is not a freak michael was a wonderful person in side and out its over now his gone.For those who writing this X@@##! about him let me ask you what would u do if some one child was to accuse u of child molesting and of course no one believed u thats what i thought you basterds. MICHAEL I LOVE U MICHAEL I LOVE YOU WHEN YOU BROWN MICHAEL I LOVE YOU NOW EVEN THOUGH YOUR SKIN IS DIFFERENT MICHAEL YOU ALWAYS HAD MY HEART JUST SAVE A SEAT FOR ME IN HEAVEN,LOVE YOU MICHAEL

[Report]

Wed Jul 8 2009 14:30:14 By: michael_1972 (

1)
Why doesn't that tabloids and paparazzi LEAVE HIM ALONE! That is EVIL money that you are all making out of his name.NO MATTER WHAT WAS SAID AND DONE IN HIS PAST AND EVEN MORE NOW THAT HE IS WITH OUR LORD,YOU CAN'T HURT HIM ANYMORE! HE IS OUR HERO AND AN NEVER ENDING UMPERISHABLE LEGACY! The cover for this magazine was the last draw! WE "THE HUMAN RACE" WILL ALWAYS LOVE AND RESPECT HIS PRESENCE HERE ON EARTH. THOSE OF US WHO CONTINUE TO RESPECT HIM WILL EVENTUALLY MEET HIM IN OUR LORDS KINGDOM. FOR THOSE WHO DISPLAY SELFISH BEHAVIOR TOWARDS HIM......WE WHO LOVE MICHAEL JACKSON, will pray for you all.
Go in peace Michael......we love you and we'll defend and preserve your LEGACY!
your fans across the pacific

[Report]

Wed Jul 8 2009 17:55:35 By: Maliyaramelle (

1)
Whether the man was or was not a child molester is between him and the good Lord. The ISSUE here is whether or not that magazine cover was in bad taste, and it WAS. You also have to wonder what kind of person would be so cold and callous as to take a picture of someone in a medical crisis. Jeers to the person who took the photo (would you like your family to see your dead body on the cover of a magazine?)and Jeers to OK! for printing it. EXTREMELY POOR TASTE!

[Report]

Thu Jul 9 2009 14:25:14 By: pumpkin_50 (

2)
Has anyone asked who took the photo? If you look at the video footage of the ambulance reversing out there were not press/photographers inside the grounds and the guy taking the video footage didn't get it so who did and when? Also look at Michael's sideburns and face colour - too dark to be dead surely? Although it has to be said if he was faking it they could have done a better job - but I hope he was and that he is still alive, also why was the ambulance reversing so slowly - surely if it were a matter of life and death they would have knocked the wall down to get him out quicker? God be with you Michael wherever you are.

[Report]

Fri Jul 10 2009 08:36:54 By: pumpkin_50 (

2)
Sorry to add to this for those of you who are bored, but if you see a photo of the mansion MJ was renting and living at the time of his heart attack it is hugh with a huge driveway with a central waterfall type thing, plenty of space for an ambulance to drive right round even taking into account that there might be other cars there, couldn't soemone have pre-empted the situation if other cars were in the way and moved them for the ambulance to just drive out? Also why did his doctor try CPR for 30 mins BEFORE contacting 911? Was this because if MJ is dead it was him who administered the fatal injection and he was scared and hope he could revive him without 911. Some reports say he went in the ambulance and carried out the further CPR at the hospital, some reports say he disappeared for 24 hours. Too many questions as yet unanswered.

[Report]

Sun Jul 12 2009 13:50:23 By: mathediene (

95)
it's so sad to know he's gone..why this pic. and so big!
better to put this pic. inside the magazine..and put another from MJ on the frontpage.

[Report]

Tue Aug 18 2009 18:13:44 By: francyrossi (

1)
I think that media sometimes are just interested to create a sensation. This magazine did not need such a cover to attract readers as MJ was laready big news. He was a great man and he would have deserved privacy. The right to privacy for sure covers the right of leaving your body (die) in peace and with no need of paparazzi around. It is already a difficult moment for all those who loved him so it would be nice to help them remember him in his best shape ! Fortunately MJ is so great that even in this ugly cover he looks fine. Regardless, it should not have been publicshed. And no, I do not think this is "information"; it is not. Who cares about this photo? We care about the fantastic inheritance that he left us: his music, his innovative videos and his fantastic dance, his professionalism as a performer. He is a model for the millions !

[Report]

Fri Sep 11 2009 02:49:56 By: Anonymous User
its not a gruesome picture. Everybody will go someday. At least we get to see him the last time.

[Report]

Tue Dec 15 2009 05:06:31 By: Bediveare (

2)
I myself personally feel that the photo should not be revealed,he has many many fans that want to see and remember him as he was, that amazing entertainer that satisfied them for many years, the eccentricity he had was unique which made him Michael |Jackson without that he would'nt be Michael Jackson, it's through that of which made him so popular in the first place plus his amazing intellect within his music/Dance/and writing.
There will never be another like him, the uniqueness of him stands out more than any other performer in history.
I don't ever recall any celebrity or famous person's photo being revealed on the front of magazines after death, why do this to Michael Jackson,was he so different? or is the family selling such things just to make more money out of him?
This must have been approved by the family?
I feel this could damage the magazine in question even if the inside reveals tributes to our King Of Pop.
This is very sad to see and I am sure lots of other people will follow my view on this.
He did'nt belong to us in the United Kingdom but he did a lot of work here and has many many loyal fans all over the world, why can't people just respect both him and his fans. I am sure he would hate his loyal fans to see this.
Regards,
Bediveare (UK)

[Report]

Starpulse.com

Your Entertainment Destination

Starpulse Entertainment News

OK! Magazine Michael Jackson Cover Picture Features MJ Dead On Stretcher

What Do You Think?

Follow Starpulse

Subscribe