Sun Nov 9 2008 18:12:44 By: wolverinedeath ( 207)
whatever animal the fur came from, she should pose nude with the animal and see what animal rights people have to complain about then

Mon Nov 10 2008 08:09:18 By: dhowland ( 9)
Who cares about photos being airbrush? You have other celebrities who have had plastic surgery. I ask what is the difference. There are bigger problems in our country then if a celebrity airbrushed a photo. If Kate Winslet is so firm on the wearing of real fur then why didnt she ask to confirm if it was fake or real so shame on you on that one Winslet. There is absolutely no excuse for that one. If you were to be photographed with snakes one would ask if they were going to be real or not. I believe the fur would have been in the same situation, if you truly stand up against the killing of an animal for its fur then you would have asked if it was real or fake. So Winslet sorry but this one is on you.

Mon Nov 10 2008 15:33:23 By: ipsofacto ( 1076)
Something else for the animal
rights campaigners to gnash their
teeth over. There weren't any
there during the stone age when
they had to wear fur to keep warm. As it has been said before I don't hear them whining over killing the animals who provide leather for
their shoes or do they wear plastic? That is bad for the
environment when they are discarded, isn't it? Or is that
for someone else to campaign about today!